Which statement best explains the fallacy in the
argument?
taney is quick to assume that the writers of the us
constitution excluded african americans born in the
country from citizenship
taney unfairly appeals to human emotion by
creating a sense of hopelessness for enslaved
persons during the time of the case.
because the constitution does not explicitly exclude
african americans from citizenship, taney is
begging the claim
the men who wrote the constitution made a
mistake in not writing about the position of enslaved
people within the nation,

it’s a

answer: a. 74

step-by-step explanation:

it shows divided evenly, so add the 37+37 = 74

true

step-by-step explanation:

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.