In a study 1 examining gender bias, a nationwide sample of 127 science professors evaluated the application materials of an undergraduate student who had ostensibly applied for a laboratory manager position. all the faculty members received the same application, with half randomly given a male name and half randomly given a female name. we see that the applications with female names received a significantly lower recommended salary. does gender of the evaluator make a difference? in particular, considering only the 64 applications with female names, is the mean recommended salary different depending on the gender of the evaluating faculty member? the 32 male faculty gave a mean starting salary of $27,111 with a standard deviation of $6,948 while the 32 female faculty gave a mean starting salary of $25,000 with a standard deviation of $7,966. the standard error of the difference is $1,868.14.

i don't even know man. edge inuity be messing with us. i had to ask a question too.

step-by-step explanation:

12: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. is a total of 7 hours.

4: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. is a total of 3 hours.

this means that from 4: 00 p.m to 7: 00 p.m. this represents 3/7 of what was lost from 12: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m.

after knowing this, after doing 11,600 - 6,800 = 4,800

4,800 represents 3/7 of what was lost for 7 hours.

we then divide 4,800 by 3 which gets 1,600.

because we know that 1,600 represents 1/7 of how much water was lost, we just have to multiply by 7, which gets 11,200.   after adding 11,200 to how much water was left at 7: 00 p.m. which was 6,800. 11,200 + 6,800 = 18,000

this means that the pool originally had 18,000 gallons in the pool.

you can also check your work by doing 18,000 - 4(1600), which becomes           1800 - 6400 which gets you 11,600.

answer:   x = 3 + √11     and     x = 3 - √11

step-by-step explanation:

x² - 6x + 9 = 11

(x - 3)² = 11

x - 3 = ±√11

    x = 3 ± √11

x = 3 + √11     and     x = 3 - √11