The mayor of a town believes that over 39% of the residents favor annexation of a new bridge. is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to support the mayor's claim? after information is gathered from 130 voters and a hypothesis test is completed, the mayor decides to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 level.
what is the conclusion regarding the mayor's claim?
sufficient evidence or non sufficient evidence

the answer will be

let x be the money she spent so that she can earn the free t-shirt.

since, she already spent $112.49

⇒

also, as per the statement: jennifer must spend $250 or more in order to qualify for a free t-shirt at the store.

then,

we have an inequality i.,e

subtract 112.49 from both sides we get;

therefore, $137. 51 more money does jennifer need to spend so that she can earn the free t-shirt

the probability that a bird is green (.30) is true

step-by-step explanation: