Solve the lp relaxation graphically. round this solution to the nearest integer solution and check whether it is feasible. then enumerate all the rounded solutions by rounding the solution for the lp relaxation in all possible ways (i. e., by rounding each noninteger value both up and down). for each rounded solution, check for feasibility and, if feasible, calculate z. are any of these feasible rounded solutions optimal for the ip problem?

the answer is (4,3)

since the rule for r0, 90º is (-y,x) and it was already applied to form the image, all you have to do is reverse the answer using this formula.

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v

0.85% : )

step-by-step explanation: