Myra uses an inverse variation function to model the data for the ordered pairs below.
(2, 30), (3, 20), (4, 15), (5, 12), (6, 10)
which statement best explains whether an inverse variation function is the best model for the data?
o an inverse function is the best model because as x increases, y decreases
o an inverse function is the best model because the products of corresponding x- and y-values are equal.
o an inverse variation function is not the best model because data points approximate a straight line.
o an inverse variation function is not the best model because the data points show an exponential decay.

c - they will have the same distribution

step-by-step explanation:

this is the only one that could make sense. : )

correct choice is b

step-by-step explanation:

when you calculate the average rate of change of a function, you are finding the slope of the secant line between the two points. for the function the average rate of change from point to point can be calculated as

to find the average rate of change from day 2 to day 10, note that at day 2, 8 houses were sold, so a(2,8) and at day 10, 2 houses were sold, so b(10,2). thus,

other answer is correct. i had used the radius of the radius somehow. a website:

no

step-by-step explanation:

answer