Arelation is given below.
{(0, 0), (2, 0.5), (4, 1), (3, 1.5), (4, 2), (5, 1.5), (6,8)}
which ordered pair can be removed to make this relation a function?
why would removing this ordered pair make the relation a function?

If x=-3 is the only x-intercept of the graph of a quadratic equation, which statement best discribes the discriminant of the equation?

A) if $50000 is invested in a bank account that pays 9.3% of interest compounded on a six-monthly basis, how much money will be in the account after 3 and 12 years? b) if matusalen's father had put $2.0 in the bank when he was born and there, how long would matusalen have had to his death (969 years later) if the interest was 7% per year composed each month and weekly?

Examine the paragraph proof. which theorem does it offer proof for? prove jnm – nmi according to the given information in the image. jk | hi while jnm and lnk are vertical angles. jnm and lnk are congruent by the vertical angles theorem. because lnk and nmi are corresponding angles, they are congruent according to the corresponding angles theorem. finally, jnm is congruent to nmi by the transitive property of equality alternate interior angles theorem gorresponding angle theorem vertical angle theorem o same side interior angles theorem