Mathematics, 28.11.2019 20:31 evelyng58
Samuel said that 16: 36 was equivalent to 72: 32. what was samuel's error? the ratio was not chosen from the same columns. he did not look at the correct rows. this problem was impossible. 16: 36 has no equivalent ratios. the first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30, shadowentity43
Question 5 spring semester final exam math evaluate
Answers: 1
Samuel said that 16: 36 was equivalent to 72: 32. what was samuel's error? the ratio was not chosen...
Biology, 20.08.2020 14:01