When testing gas pumps for accuracy, fuel-quality enforcement specialists tested pumps and found that 1294 of them were not pumping accurately (within 3.3 oz when 5 gal is pumped), and 5705 pumps were accurate. use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim of an industry representative that less than 20% of the pumps are inaccurate. use the p-value method and use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. a. h0: p=0.2h1: p> 0.2b. h0: p=0.2h1: ≠0.2c. h0: p≠0.2h1: p=0.2d. h0: p> 0.2h1: p=0.2e. h0: p=0.2h1: p< 0.2f. h0: p< 0.2h1: p=0.2the test static is z=the p-value is=because the p-value is (greater than/less than) the significance level (fail to reject/reject) the null hypothesis. there is (sufficient/insufficient) evidence support the claim that less than 20% of the pumps are inaccurate.

not only in mathematics, scientific proof also are required in the other field of science. also maths proofs are of particular structure, containing steps and logics. so proving is like doing science, it is science. that's why it is important to prove. 

an inaccurate proof leads to errors, or stating results that are not accurate.  which wil mess the probelm up you dont want this

answer: 4 meters

step-by-step explanation: to you understand 2/3 better you can do 1 divided by 3 = . then multiply that by the 2 which is .66666666666666667 then you would do 6 x .66666666666666667 which is 4.      

hope this .

im with everythinglos so yeahhhhh

step-by-step explanation:

b) k’(6, 4); l’(3, 3)

step-by-step explanation:

a 270° clockwise rotation maps every point (x, y) to (y, -x). (it negates the x-coordinate and then switches it and the y-coordinate.)

this means the endpoints of the side congruent to kl, k' and l', would be mapped as:

k'(-4, 6)→(6, 4)

l'(-3, 3)→(3, 3)