Does this make sense?
1. to scale up the ratio of 30 boys to 48 girls you need to multiply. the two equivalent ratios i scaled were 60: 96 and 180: 288 boys to girls.
ex: 30/48*2=60/96
ex: 60/96*3=180/288
2. to scale down the ratio of 30 boys to 48 girls you need to divide. the two equivalent ratios i scaled were 30: 48 and 10: 16 boys to girls.
ex: 60/24/2=30/48
ex: 30/48/3=10/16

p ÷ r = tan(x)

step-by-step explanation:

given that there is a figure below shows a right triangle: a right triangle is shown with hypotenuse equal to q units and the length of the legs equal to p units and r units.

graph is missing so i will create the graph as per given information.

the angle between the legs having lengths p units and q units is y degrees. the angle between the legs having lengths r units and q units is x degrees.

now we need to find about what is p ÷ r equal to.

so we can use trigonometric ratio tan(x)=[altitude]/[base] to find the value of p ÷ r, because p is the altitude and r is the base.

p ÷ r=tan(x)

hence final answer is p ÷ r=tan(x).

a

step-by-step explanation:

48 / 6 = x

in this case, x will equal the amount of money in each card!

x therefore will be 8.

trent had $8 in each birthday card.

yes

step-by-step explanation:

they have to be opposite and reciprocal of eachother.