What is the greatest common factor of 72 and 36

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The mean finish time was 185.52 with a standard deviation of 0.327 minute. the winning car driven by chris finished in 185.13. the previous year race had a mean finish time of 110.3 with a standard deviation of 0.106. the winning car that year driven by karen finished in 110.13 minutes. find their respective z-scores. chris - z-score karen “- z-score

If a flying disk is 139 meters in the air and travels at an average of 13 m/s how long is it in the air