Reber and kotovsky (1997), in a study of problem solving, described one of their results comparing a specific group of participants within their overall control condition as follows: "this group took an average of 179 moves to solve the puzzle, whereas the rest of the control participants took an average of 74 moves, t1192 = 3.31, p 6 .01" (p. 183). explain this result to a person who has never had a course in statistics. (focus on the meaning of this result in terms of the general logic of hypothesis testing and statistical significance.)

(c, 0) i might be wrong so don't put full faith on my answer

i used to know how to do this in 7th but i forget easily

step-by-step explanation:

the population of other specie of birds will decline or other specie of birds will find some alternate source of food to survive.

explanation:

according to the competitive exclusion principle, which is also known as gause's law, two specie living in the same niche and feeding on the same resource cannot co-exist stably.

as we have well studied the theory of natural selection which states that only those organisms survive which have better tendency to compete for food and adapt to the environmental conditions.

coming towards the question, what wi ll happen when one species outcompetes the other for the small fish , the other specie will not get enough food and will start to die or decline in population. eventually either other specie needs to find another alternative food source for itself or migrate at some other location where there is less competition otherwise it will just not exist anymore at that niche.

hope it !