Angie and becky each completed a separate proof to show that the measures of vertical angles akg and hkb are equal. who completed the proof incorrectly? explain.
line ab intersecting line gh at k
angie's proof
statement justification
1. segment gh intersects segment ab at k 1. given
2. m∠akg + m∠gkb = 180°
m∠gkb + m∠hkb = 180° 2. definition of supplementary angles
3. m∠akg + m∠ gkb = m∠gkb + m∠hkb 3. substitution property
4. m∠akg = m∠hkb 4. subtraction property
becky's proof
statement justification
1. segment gh intersects segment ab at k 1. given
2. m∠akg + m∠gkb = 180°
m∠gkb + m∠hkb = 180° 2. angle addition postulate
3. m∠akg + m∠ gkb = m∠gkb + m∠hkb 3. substitution property
4. m∠akg = m∠hkb 4. subtraction property

too many. (jk)

31 v bucks

step-by-step explanation:

since you bought 25 on friday and 6 on tuesday, you can just add them up.

25+6=31

check your work.

31-6=25

i hope this !

-yand3r3

step-by-step explanation:

consider the parallelogram shown in the attached image.

in the parallelogram hijk, the length of hk is given as,

from the properties of parallelogram we know that the opposite sides of a parallelogram are parallel to each other and are equal in measure.

therefore, the length of the side ij must be equal to the length of the side hk and that is .

hence, the expression for the length of ij confirms that hijk is a parallelogram.

answer: the answer to this problem is yes because 4n + 4 does equal 2m - 6

step-by-step explanation: first you have to calculate 2m - 6 second you have to calculate 4n + 4 finally you have to get your answer