subject
Mathematics, 07.09.2019 21:20 GreenHerbz206

Which of the following is not a logical consequence of ax(loves(x, c) --> loves(c, x)) o a) ~ex(loves(x, c) ^_~loves(c, x)) o b) axloves(x, c) --> ayloves(c, y) oc) loves(cc) o d) exloves(x, c) --> eyloves(c, y)

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00, travisvb
If f(x)=2x-6 and g(x)=3x+9, find (f-g)(x)
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:20, clairajogriggsk
Consider the proof. given: segment ab is parallel to line de. prove: what is the missing statement in step 5?
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:10, idc23
To prove that angle def = angle dgf by sas, what additional information is needed? def congruent to dgf dfe congruent to dfg de congruent to dg dg congruent to gf
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30, magics
Factor the polynomial, if possible. if the polynomial cannot be factored, write prime. 9n^3 + 27n^2 – 25n – 75
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following is not a logical consequence of ax(loves(x, c) --> loves(c, x)) o a) ~ex(...

Questions in other subjects: