Branden and janna are analyzing the same conditional statement. branden finds multiple examples that validate the conditional statement. janna finds one example that satisfies the hypothesis of the conditional statement, but not the conclusion. which must be true?
a. the conditional statement is true. there are more examples that validate the statement than there are that do not.
b. the conditional statement is true. there is at least one example that validates the statement.
c. the conditional statement is false. there is at least one counterexample for the statement.
d. the conditional statement is false. there must be exactly one example that validates the statement.

given that triangle abc is transformed two times to get triangle

a"b"c"

first abc is transformed in to a'b'c' as follows:

the coordinates of a are (1,-1) and transformed into a'(-1,1)

similarly b (4,-2) became b'(-4,2) and

c(7,-2) became c'(-7,2)

i.e. (x,y) becomes (-x,-y)

this is nothing but reflection about a point here origin.

thus first transformation is reflection on the origin.

next is exactly shifting 3 units down

source:

the answer is c just got it on ed

step-by-step explanation:

-2x + 7 = 7

subtract 7 from both sides.

-2x = 0

divide both sides by -2.

x = 0

0.02

step-by-step explanation:

time of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the 2 hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom at 0 k (but other seconds are sometimes used in astronomy)