The following is an incomplete paragraph proving that ∠wrs ≅ ∠vqt, given the information in the figure where segment uv is parallel to segment wz.:
segments uv and wz are parallel segments that intersect with line st at points q and r, respectively.
according to the given information, segment uv is parallel to segment wz, while angles squ and vqt are vertical angles. angle vqt is congruent to angle squ by the vertical angles theorem. because angles squ and wrs are corresponding angles, they are congruent according to the corresponding angles theorem. finally, angle vqt is congruent to angle wrs by the property.
which property of equality accurately completes the proof?
reflexive
substitution
subtraction
transitive

the inequality is:

250c+180g≥950

step-by-step explanation:

let c denotes the number of days in a week   miyoko worked as a cryptographer.

and g denotes the number of days in a week she works as a geologist.

now we are given that she earns $250 for every day she works as a cryptographer,and earns $180 for every day she works as a geologist.

now miyoko's goal is to earn more than $950 this week.

hence, the inequality could be represented as:

250c+180g≥950

.632

step-by-step explanation:

6 * 1/10 = 3/5

3*0.01 = 0.03

3/5 + 0.03 = .63

2*0.002 = .002

.63 + 0.002 = .632

0.6, 3/5, and 6% are the 3 same portion.

but, when they're all changed to a decimal they would equal to 0.6.

hope this , good luck!

they go with it happens or they mite give a chance?

step-by-step explanation: