subject
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 20:00 lorelaistudent

There are other ways of expressing uncertainty besides significant figures. for example, suppose a quantity is known to have a value between 20.4 and 20.0 and our best estimate of the value is midrange at 20.2. we could write the number as 20.2 +/- 0.2 and say that the number has a 1% uncertainty. we would also say it has 3 significant figures. if we square a number with 1% uncertainty (i. e., 2 parts in about 200) and 3 significant figures, what results? 1 unlocks icon subscribe to course hero to unlock this document unlocks icon subscribe to course hero to unlock this document unlocks icon subscribe to course hero to unlock this document

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30, Greekfreak
To determine the number of deer in a forest a forest ranger tags 280 and releases them back
Answers: 3
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30, letsbestupidcx7734
Two cyclists 84 miles apart start riding toward each other at the samen time. one cycles 2 times as fast as the other. if they meet 4 hours later what is the speed (in miles) of the faster cyclists
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:20, Tnaaasty5901
Convert the mixed numbers into improper fractions. convert the improper fraction to mixed numbers.
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00, zalyndevola
Solve this problem! extra ! 3025/5.5 = a/90.75 / = fraction
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
There are other ways of expressing uncertainty besides significant figures. for example, suppose a q...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 09.06.2021 19:10
Konu
Mathematics, 09.06.2021 19:10