Mathematics, 22.06.2019 21:40 kaylaamberd
Apartial proof was constructed given that mnop is a parallelogram. by the definition of a parallelogram, mn ∥ po and mp ∥ no. using mp as a transversal, ∠m and ∠p are same-side interior angles, so they are supplementary. using no as a transversal, ∠n and ∠o are same-side interior angles, so they are supplementary. using op as a transversal, ∠o and ∠p are same-side interior angles, so they are supplementary. therefore, and because they are supplements of the same angle. which statements should fill in the blanks in the last line of the proof? ∠m is supplementary to ∠n; ∠m is supplementary to ∠o ∠m is supplementary to ∠o; ∠n is supplementary to ∠p ∠m ≅ ∠p; ∠n ≅ ∠o ∠m ≅ ∠o; ∠n ≅ ∠p
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30, extasisjorge
Ming says that 0.24 > 1/4 because 0.24= 2/4. which best explains mings error
Answers: 1
Apartial proof was constructed given that mnop is a parallelogram. by the definition of a parallelog...
Mathematics, 17.10.2020 14:01
Mathematics, 17.10.2020 14:01
Mathematics, 17.10.2020 14:01
Physics, 17.10.2020 14:01
Mathematics, 17.10.2020 14:01