Gable and lutz (2000) studied 65 children, 3 to 10 years old, and their parents. one of their results was “parental control of child eating showed a negative association with children’s participation in extracurricular activities (r = - .34; p < .01).” another result was “parents who held less appropriate beliefs about children’s nutrition reported that their children watched more hours of television per day (r = .36; p < .01).” (both quotes from page 296.) explain these results as if you were writing to a person who has never had a course in statistics. be sure to comment on possible directions of causality for each result.

i think it's either c or d

step-by-step explanation: the entire question is extremely odd. 04 obviously refers to the interest rate. honestly i will say the answer is c. because the (2 x 12) part would mean it's compounded semiannually. i'll say choose c.

answer: option a.

step-by-step explanation:

you know that the quadrilateral opqr ( a four sided figure) is inscribed in circle. this means that all its vertices are on the circle.

then, by definition, the opposite angles of the quadrilateral are supplementary, this means that the sum of their measures is 180 degrees.

you can observe in the figure that the angles ∠opq   and the angle ∠orq   are opposite, therefore:

then, can be used to d to calculate the measure of ∠opq

answer:

step-by-step explanation:

here, the total dishes = 10

dishes having meat = 3 ( chicken, meatloaf and hamburger )

thus, the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes = number of dishes having meat / total dishes

=

therefore, the probability of not having meat = 1- the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes

=

=

=

⇒ option b is correct.