Peter is conducting an experiment to determine whether a new medication is effective in reducing swelling. he gets 1,500 volunteers with swelling and divides them into two groups. the control group does not receive any medication; the treatment group receives the medication. the patients in the treatment group show reduced signs of swelling. what can peter conclude from this experiment?

Peter can conclude that the new medication is effective in reducing swelling

Step-by-step explanation:

The patients in the treatment group show reduced signs of swelling. therefore, Peter can conclude that the new medication is effective in reducing swelling

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that Peter is conducting an experiment to determine whether a new medication is effective in reducing swelling.

So when he divides 1500 volunteers with swelling into two groups and gives one group medication, he can find the difference in the two groups.

He can find average problem after medication/no medication for the two groups and conduct a hypothesis testing for comparison of difference of means.

This would help him to conclude whether the new medication has a significant effective role in reducing swelling.

i'm pretty sure it's 477,585,296, but perhaps my math is incorrect.