Why might using tables be a poor option for solving a problem?
a)you can use them to expirement with data
b)you often cannot find patterns
c)you might also have to use an equation if the problem is complicated
d)you can use them to organize

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Because harder problems do require equations you cannot solve E=MC square without an equation. OH wait it is an equation E represents units of energy, m represents units of mass, and c2 is the speed of light squared, or multiplied by itself.

C

Step-by-step explanation:

If you ask me none of these are reasons to not use a table but for the sake of the question it is probably C. Both A and D are reasons to use a table, and option B is simply false, you very much can find patterns when using tables. As for why C is the most viable answer? Well thats the only one that (truthfully) describes a flaw of using a table, the rest are either untrue or they are describing the pros of using a table.

the naturalist literary movement was an extension of the realist literary movement, a movement that strove to portray life as it really was hope it

step-by-step explanation: