Asixth-grade class has 20 total students, while the entire middle school has 1,000 students. a census is taken of the entire school’s population to see on which day of the week every student was born. theoretically, 14.3%, or 1/7 of the students should have been born on each day. the table here shows that the results for the entire school are closer to this prediction than the results for the sixth-grade class are. what is a good explanation for this?

a) the sixth-graders were all born during the same year and that year was probably an unusual, aberrant year.
b) the data for the entire school is more statistically meaningful because it is drawn from a much larger population.
c) sixth-graders are younger than the rest of the middle school and more likely to have made errors in their data collection.
d) the data for the entire school reflects students from different grades, while the data for the sixth-grade class is only for sixth-graders.

starting with:    

5 + x - 12 = 2x - 7   

5 + x - 12 - x = 2x - 7 - x (subtract x from both sides)   

5 - 12 = x - 7 (combine and cancel x's from both sides)   

5 - 12 + 7 = x - 7 + 7 (add 7 to both sides)   

0 = x (add numbers together on both sides)       

so in order for the equation to be true, x must be 0.   

trying x = -0.5   

5 + x - 12 = 2x - 7 (original equation)   

5 + -0.5 - 12 = 2(-0.5) - 7 (plug in value of x)   

5 + -0.5 - 12 = -1 - 7 (did multiplication)   

-7.5 = -8 (did addition on both sides)       

since -7.5 is obviously not equal to -8, the value of -0.5 for x is wrong.   

trying x = 0   

5 + x - 12 = 2x - 7 (original equation)   

5 + 0 - 12 = 2(0) - 7 (plug in value of x)   

5 + 0 - 12 = 0 - 7 (did multiplication)   

-7 = -7 (did addition on both sides)       

since -7 equals -7, that demonstrates that the value of 0 for x is correct.   

trying x = 1   

5 + x - 12 = 2x - 7 (original equation)   

5 + 1 - 12 = 2(1) - 7 (plug in value of x)   

5 + 1 - 12 = 2 - 7 (did multiplication)   

-6 = -5 (did addition on both sides)       

since -6 is obviously not equal to -5, the value of 1 for x is wrong.

table a is wierd

step-by-step explanation:

6*f

0.0076, if you meant 4.125 divided by 0.03125 it would be 132

step-by-step explanation:

first you have to move the decimal in 0.03125 over until its behind the 5 which is 5 places over. now the number is 3125

then you have to move the decimal in 4.125, 5 places over. now the number is 4,112,500.

now you divide like you would normally would and get 0.0076

the homeowners insurance cost for a 115,000 wood frame house is 80,500.

step-by-step explanation:

it is given that the coverage rate for wood frame house is 0.7.

the value of wood frame house is 115,000.

.

homeowners insurance cost for a 115,000 wood frame house is

therefore the homeowners insurance cost for a 115,000 wood frame house is 80,500.