Erin writes the set of ordered pairs below. the set represents a function. {(3, –3), (5, 0), (–1, 4), (–6, 7)} erin claims that she can add any point to the set and have the set still represent a function. which of the following points can be used to show that erin's claim is incorrect?

Iwill give brainliest. suppose tommy walks from his home at (0, 0) to the mall at (0, 5), and then walks to a movie theater at (6, 5). after leaving the theater tommy walks to the store at (6, 0) before returning home. if each grid square represents one block, how many blocks does he walk?