It would be so greatly appreciated if you could me with my geometry
i have tried five different times to complete this but each time i get 10% on my assignmentss

1. Which method listed below could not be used to prove that two triangles are congruent?

Option b. Prove all three sets of corresponding angles congruent.

2. Which of the following best describes the problem with this approach?

Option D. A single counterexample will invalidate the proof.

3. What reason can be used to prove that the triangles are congruent and why?

SSS

4. What is the length of side UV?

Option A. 14 inches

5. Which of the following properties would indicate that triangle ABC = triangle XYZ?

Option B. <B=<Y, AB=XY, <A=<X

6. Triangle ABC is an isosceles triangle with AB=BC. What is the value of x?

Option B. 25°

7. Whichy of the following statements is not accurate and would not help prove that the base angles of an isosceles triangle are congruent?

Option B. <JKL=<LMK because all right angles measure 90°

8. Which additional information would be enough to prove that triangle ABC = triangle DEF?

Option a. AB=DE

9. Which additional information is sufficient to prove triangle APB = triangle JPK by side-angle-side?

Option d. <1=<2

3. Which statement is not true of these two figures?  

Statement C.  

4. What was the factor of dilation?  

Option D. 3/2  

5. What will be the coordinates of point M'?  

Option B. (2,-4)  

6. Which rule represents the change for a coordinate pair in the original figure to its corresponding coordinate pair in the final figure?  

Option C. (x,y)→(x,-y+5)  

7. Which sequence of rigid motions could be used to transform trapezoid ABCD to trapezoid A'B'C'D'?  

Option C. a 180° rotation of trapezoid ABCD followed by a horizontal reflection.  

8. Transform triangle DEF by performing a reflection across the x-axis followed by a translation of 2 units right.  

See the attached graph.

Step-by-step explanation:  

Please, see the attached files.

600,000,000,000, or 6e14

step-by-step explanation:

ok thats very interesting