Solve the equation for x, accurate to three decimal places: log3 (log2 x) = 1.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Hillel is juggling flaming torches to raise money for charity. his initial appearance raises $500\$500 $500 , and he raises $15\$15 $15 for each minute of juggling performance. the amount rr r of money hillel raises is a function of tt t , the length of his performance in minutes. write the function's formula.

You and a friend went to the movies. you spent half your money on tickets. then you spent 1/4 of the money on popcorn, $2 on candy, and $3 on a soda. if you have $1 left, hiw much money did u take to the movies?