Rose claims that since triangle mtw is congruent to triangle rfs are both equiangular triangles, then they must be congruent by the sss congruence postulate. determine whether rose correct or incorrect. some on me .

Rose is correct because if they are equiangular, all the angles equal 60. Equal angles implies equal sides. Both of the triangles have congruent sides meaning that it could be proved by SSS (If I worded it weirdly, feel free to ask questions if you still don't understand. I tried my best).

The last one bc that's a calendar