Iwill award brainliest ! anita says that you can rewrite any proof that uses the aas theorem as a proof that uses the asa postulate. do you agree with anita? explain.

Yes Anita is correct.

Explanation: We use the fact that the sum of all angles in a triangle is 180 degrees. Given any two angles and one non-included side (ie, AAS), we can apply the difference 180-angle1-angle2 to calculate the remaining, third angle. This allows us to consider the new angle and one of the given angles as including the given side, which is now a ASA problem and can be solved using the ASA Postulate. The rewrite is valid because we are not adding any new conditions to the premise "if two angles and a side are congruent."

what is the approximate angle of acb if abc is 25cm and the length of segment bc is 15

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v