Ruben said that 96.52 ÷ 12.7 equals 7.6. is ruben's answer reasonable? a. no, ruben's answer should be closer to 0.8. b. no, ruben's answer should be closer to 80. c. no, ruben's answer should be closer to 800. d. yes, ruben's answer is reasonable.

I’m stuck on this equation, anyone got the answer?

A. use the formula for continuous compounding with the original example: $1000 invested at 2% for 1 year. record the amount to 5 decimal places. use a calculator. b. compare it to the result using the original compound interest formula with n = 365 calculated to 5 decimal places. which has a larger value? explain.

Given: lines a and b are parallel and line c is a transversal. prove: 2 is supplementary to 8 what is the missing reason in the proof? statement reason 1. a || b, is a transv 1. given 2. ∠6 ≅ ∠2 2. ? 3. m∠6 = m∠2 3. def. of congruent 4. ∠6 is supp. to ∠8 4. def. of linear pair 5. ∠2 is supp. to ∠8 5. congruent supplements theorem corresponding angles theorem alternate interior angles theorem vertical angles theorem alternate exterior angles theorem