Which statement provides a counterexample to the following faulty definition? a square is a figure with four congruent sides. question 8 options: a six-sided figure can have four sides congruent. a rectangle has four sides. some triangles have all sides congruent. a square has four congruent angles.

1. The six-sided figure can have 4 sides congruent but is not a square.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the statement,

'A square is a figure with four congruent sides'.

It is required to find the statement which is the counter-example for the above statement.

For the counter-example, the statement should hold:

1. The figure has 4 congruent sides

2. The figure is not a square.

According to the options, we see that,

The six-sided figure can have 4 sides congruent but is not a square.

Thus, option 1 is true.

hello :

by applying the distributive property :

6 × 4.3 = 6 × ( 4 + 0.3 )

            =   (6 ×   4) + (6 ×   0.3)

            = 24 + 1.8

6 × 4.3 = 25.8

ljn

step-by-step explanation: