Jessica and Emma are full-time employees at the Benjamin Limited Liability Company. They went to a coffee house named New Heaven Café near their office in the lunch time. Jessica ordered one coffee for her and a bottle of beer for her friend. Emma drank about half of the bottle, which was made of dark glass and labelled with white bold words. When Emma poured the remainder of the beer into a tumbler, she found a stranger. At this point, the decomposed remains of a snail floated out. She was shocked and suffered a severe painful stomach. She had to spend a week in hospital. The doctor confirmed that her stomach problems might have been caused by the inferior quality beer.
The Western Beverages company which manufactured and supplied beer to New Heaven Café confirmed that their manufacturing process was controlled strictly, which had never caused any incidents like that.
Emma’s boss was very angry when she had a week leave in busy days at work. She explained that she had an urgent health problem. However, the boss was insistent with his intention; she was fired on the first day she was back to work. Emma is so upset and needs some legal advice.
Requirements:
Emma has approached you for some legal advice. Write a report outlining the following:
Explain the above legal issues with reference to the English legal system, decided and recorded case law.
The assignment will be assessed by reference to the following criteria:
1. Emma confuses as to whether there is a contract between her and the beer
manufacturer. Explain the essential elements of contract.
2. Advise Emma whether she may successfully sue the Western Beverages company
for negligence. Explain the essential elements to claim for negligence.
3. Advise Emma of her legal position with regards to Benjamin Limited Liability
Company. Explain the different types of dismissal.

The exclusionary rule states that if evidence is found during an illegal search, it must be destroyed immediately. cannot be admitted into consideration. can be admitted into court anyway. cannot be admitted into court unless a judge agrees.

What is the difference between university and college?

September 10, 2016: you’ve been assigned to investigate a hit-and-run incident. when you arrive at the scene, it’s raining and foggy. the roads are slick. it looks like the crash occurred during the early evening, about 5: 30 pm, a couple hours before dark. you notice a green 2010 chevrolet camaro lying off the road on an embankment and a blue 2014 toyota camry several yards back. both vehicles are damaged. robert b., the driver of the camaro, had severe back injuries and was taken to the hospital. the only witness is the toyota driver, fred h. fred h. was driving in the right lane when the accident occurred. according to fred, a red ford pickup truck (year and model unknown) suddenly swerved across the highway from the left lane. the pickup truck hit the front left side of the camaro in one of the center lanes, pushing it off the road before speeding away. the camaro lost control and sideswiped the toyota as it skidded across the highway, denting the toyota’s left side panels. the camaro then skidded across the grass to the right of the highway and crashed into a low concrete wall. the hood and both sides of the camaro have extensive damage. the toyota driver pulled up behind the camaro and called the police. the accident occurred near miami, florida, on i-95 northbound, a 5-lane highway. it happened just before the exit 16 offramp. fred h. and robert b. both passed breathalyzer tests. neither had any passengers in the car. as you search the scene, you notice: tire tracks/skid marks left on the pavement deep red scrapes across the camaro’s panels and green scrapes across the toyota’s panels broken car window fragments of a hood or panel a torn rag an empty beer can deep tire marks and footprints in the mud of the embankment at the scene use the information above to answer the following questions. for each of a – e above, give an example of a type of evidence you could collect from that item and how you would collect it. (one to two sentences each) fill out a crash form for the incident. use the form florida crash report and use the information in the description above to create a brief three- to five-sentence summary for the “narrative” section. use the witness’s description to draw a diagram of the incident. if you can’t find a piece of information for the form, just leave that part blank. impression evidence three separate tire marks were collected from the scene. the marks were found in a pattern that supports fred’s version of events. three tire tread marks, a, b, and c. tire a appears to be worn flat in the middle from overinflation, tire b is narrow and appears worn on the outside edges, tire c looks normal and is not worn at all tires leave different types of marks based on their wear patterns. for example, tires that are constantly flat will leave different impressions than tires that are normally inflated or overinflated. the tires tend to wear out on the parts that are most exposed to the road. you checked out the tires of the two vehicles at the scene. here’s what you found: two tires side by side. a camaro tire which appears to be in good shape, and a toyota tire which appears worn on the outside edges the camaro had normal tires, but the toyota’s tires were a little flat and overly worn on the outside edges. the condition of the red ford truck’s tires is unknown. match the three impressions with the cars that most likely created them. what can you hypothesize about the red pickup’s tires? could this have anything to do with the accident? explain your answer. (two to four sentences) a red pickup fitting fred’s description was later seen running a stoplight. police pulled it over for a check. its tire impressions looked like this: a single tire tread mark which appears worn on the outside edges based on the evidence, do you think this was the same red pickup that rammed the camaro? why or why not? (one to two sentences)