According to the text, the most common charge leveled against prosecutors is: a. failure to disclose evidence. b. misusing pretrial publicity. c. using false evidence in court. d. supporting perjury.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

yeah sometimes i dont know why maybe cuhz something is bothering you

this is not a question this violates the rules. but good luck getting out chum

answer:

yes, obviously. that violates r@pe and p*dophilia laws, which are some pretty serious laws if you ask me. and that is just nasty!

explanation: