An assault victim describes the attacker as “a bearded, 25-year-old black man, light-skinned, wearing a white shirt.” When the police bring the victim in for a lineup, one man has facial hair and wears a white shirt. All of the fillers wear dark shirts. None have facial hair, and several have very dark skin. If the victim chooses the bearded man in a white shirt, should this identification hold up in court? Explain your reasoning.

Based on just this question and the information provided from it, I don’t believe it would hold up in court. It’s a matter of any man who owns a white shirt may have a certain skin tone and have facial hair. She would need to know more distinctive characteristics about the person in question. Knowing a scar, the sound of his voice, etc would be a lot better then facial hair and a white shirt, something many males have.

Explanation:

the first part of the statute of limitations is the standard deadline, which gives victims of medical malpractice a certain number of years -- usually anywhere from two to six years, depending on the state -- after the malpractice occurred within which to file a lawsuit.

flexjobs recently identified 14 of the most common remote job titles, spanning a wide variety of skill sets and industries.

check out these positions to see if they're right for you!

client services director.

speech language pathologist.

business development manager.

developer.

nurse.

account manager.

accountant.

writer.

explanation: