Law, 12.10.2021 05:10 griffislandon74

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate? explain your reasoning

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Law

Law, 07.07.2019 02:10, majesticfart7736

At what part does suspect become classified as a defendant?

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 14.07.2019 05:20, canonmille2

What should you do when making a personal appeal to a procrastinator to change his/her work habits? a. use examples of how you were able to overcome procrastination to convince him/her to change. b. relay information you have heard from co-workers. c. do not give any personal information. d. explain how you have been personally impacted by his/her procrastination.

Answers: 2

continue

Law, 16.07.2019 03:20, angelreji386

When turning left or right, remember to

Answers: 2

continue

Law, 16.07.2019 17:10, camidevecchis15

Which of the following ideological types favor government activism in the economic realm? a. liberals and populists b. populists and libertarians c. conservatives and liberals d. populists and conservatives

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or...