A motorcyclist, a car driver, and a truck driver were involved in a three-vehicle accident in a busy intersection. The motorcyclist filed a negligence action against the car driver for personal injuries suffered in the accident. In the car driver's pleadings, she denied that she was negligent and raised the motorcyclist's contributory negligence as a defense. The jury returned a general verdict in favor of the car driver. The motorcyclist then filed a negligence action against the truck driver. At the appropriate time, the truck driver filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, asserting that the motorcyclist was precluded from re-litigating his contributory negligence. Is the truck driver likely to be successful

Which of the following is not a major type of cybercrime reported to the ic3? a. government impersonation scams b. advance fee fraud c. identity theft d. malware fraud

John, a 34 year old father of two children, is a member of a health maintenance organization (hmo) in texas. john has made several trips to an area clinic recommended by his hmo to seek medical attention since finding blood in his bowel movements. he has been taking large amounts of aspirin for persistent headaches but did not realize that this could cause internal bleeding. john was always seen at the clinic by a physician assistant, robert m. but never by a physician. robert didn't ask john about taking any nonprescription medications. john didn't realize that he should mention his over the counter medication (aspirin) consumption. robert tells john to take an antacid preparation to control the bleeding, but does not order any tests. he tells john to return if he is not any better. two days later, john is rushed to the area emergency room with a bowel hemorrhage.1-¿what responsibility, if any, does robert have for john's emergency? 2- does the clinic have a responsibility to provide its hmo members with the services of a physician? 3- what responsibility, as a healthcare consumer, does john have for his own medical condition?

What are the ramifications of different interpretations of the relationship between loac and human right laws?