subject
Law, 22.07.2021 19:30 villarrealc1987

A plaintiff who was a citizen of State A was traveling to adjoining State B to visit his relatives. While still in State A, the plaintiff's auto was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant, a citizen of State B. The plaintiff suffered personal injuries and damage to his vehicle amounting to approximately $90,000. The plaintiff filed suit in the federal district court for State A and obtained proper service of process on the defendant. Under the laws of State A, the driver of a vehicle that strikes another vehicle in the rear is presumed to have acted negligently, regardless of the surrounding circumstances. Neither the law of State B nor the federal statutes or case law has adopted such a rule. Should the court apply the presumption in question

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 06.07.2019 11:10, Liantic8738
Vop hearing iowa 2 tec violation discharge date expired tho can they send me to jail?
Answers: 3
image
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10, Kjcampbell2
Cases that arent resloved through plea bargaining or by a jury trial are decided by a judge in a \an a. indicmentb. grand jury. c.arraignment d. bentch trial
Answers: 3
image
Law, 11.07.2019 05:30, alexandradumit3086
"magic" mushrooms have effects similar to those of a. lsd b. pcp c. ketamine d. none of the above
Answers: 1
image
Law, 15.07.2019 23:20, drepeter86
What are the ramifications of different interpretations of the relationship between loac and human right laws?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
A plaintiff who was a citizen of State A was traveling to adjoining State B to visit his relatives....

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 30.11.2020 20:30