Wendy an 86 year old womanhas recently returned from hospital following a fall in her shower at the residential care facilityin Weston Creek where she has lived since the death of her husband 12 months ago. Wendyis independent with all activities of livingand only requires a cane for support when ambulating. Staff have noticedthat over the last three monthsWendy hasbecome increasinglywithdrawn, her appetite has decreased, she is spending more time alone in her room, refusing tohaveregular showersand delaying or at times refusing to takeher medications. Four days ago, Wendyadvised staffthat she no longer wants to live and has refused all food and fluids. Wendy has lost a considerable amount of weightand appears quitemalnourished. Staff and residents have commented on her odor and appearance. Wendy’s family havedemandedthat the residential care facility take actionand use coercion or force if necessaryto ensure that Wendy has herbasic care requirements met including, ensuring adequate diet, hydrationand personal care including bathingor they will be liable for neglect and causing Wendy’s death. A multidisciplinary team meeting is to be held to discuss the case. NARRATIVE THREE (3)QUESTION: From the perspective of your discipline, identify how you would advocate for Wendyinthe team meeting. Usethe biomedical ethical principles(beneficence, non-maleficence, justice and autonomy)andrelevant legal frameworksto justify your position. NARRATIVE FOURYou have noticed that your colleagueCai, who is usually eager, engaged and full of energy, is looking withdrawn, is quiet and shut down. She has called in sick for several shifts which is out of character for her. Caiis a new graduatewholeft China fouryears ago and chose to stay in Canberra after completingher training, during this timeCai has alsocompleted her gender transition and is now legally female. Cailoves living here but misses her family who still live overseas. Caihas been working on this ward for the last 4 months. You ask Caiif she isOK and shebursts into tears. She states that her colleagues do not include her in conversations, turn and walk away when she approaches and never ask her to join them for morning tea or to get coffee. Cai claims that her colleaguescannot even pronounce her name and call her “nurse”or “the New Grad”and use the incorrect pronoun. Caireports that nursing colleagues have also started to question her clinical practice in front of peers, patients and relatives. Cai reports to you that she is starting to dread coming to work and it makes her feel anxious. She does not think there is anything she can doto improve her situationand that management would think she is over-reacting to the workplace culture. Caiis afraidthat she will not get a good reference and it could affect her chances of securing a permanentcontract after her new graduate year. NARRATIVE FOUR (4)QUESTION: Reflect upon the case study above and discussthe legal and ethical obligationsfrom multiple perspectives.

Before a case can be heard in a state high court, it must

Issues involveing police searches are adressed in the amendment to the constitution a. sixth b. fourth. c.eighth d. fifth

September 10, 2016: you’ve been assigned to investigate a hit-and-run incident. when you arrive at the scene, it’s raining and foggy. the roads are slick. it looks like the crash occurred during the early evening, about 5: 30 pm, a couple hours before dark. you notice a green 2010 chevrolet camaro lying off the road on an embankment and a blue 2014 toyota camry several yards back. both vehicles are damaged. robert b., the driver of the camaro, had severe back injuries and was taken to the hospital. the only witness is the toyota driver, fred h. fred h. was driving in the right lane when the accident occurred. according to fred, a red ford pickup truck (year and model unknown) suddenly swerved across the highway from the left lane. the pickup truck hit the front left side of the camaro in one of the center lanes, pushing it off the road before speeding away. the camaro lost control and sideswiped the toyota as it skidded across the highway, denting the toyota’s left side panels. the camaro then skidded across the grass to the right of the highway and crashed into a low concrete wall. the hood and both sides of the camaro have extensive damage. the toyota driver pulled up behind the camaro and called the police. the accident occurred near miami, florida, on i-95 northbound, a 5-lane highway. it happened just before the exit 16 offramp. fred h. and robert b. both passed breathalyzer tests. neither had any passengers in the car. as you search the scene, you notice: tire tracks/skid marks left on the pavement deep red scrapes across the camaro’s panels and green scrapes across the toyota’s panels broken car window fragments of a hood or panel a torn rag an empty beer can deep tire marks and footprints in the mud of the embankment at the scene use the information above to answer the following questions. for each of a – e above, give an example of a type of evidence you could collect from that item and how you would collect it. (one to two sentences each) fill out a crash form for the incident. use the form florida crash report and use the information in the description above to create a brief three- to five-sentence summary for the “narrative” section. use the witness’s description to draw a diagram of the incident. if you can’t find a piece of information for the form, just leave that part blank. impression evidence three separate tire marks were collected from the scene. the marks were found in a pattern that supports fred’s version of events. three tire tread marks, a, b, and c. tire a appears to be worn flat in the middle from overinflation, tire b is narrow and appears worn on the outside edges, tire c looks normal and is not worn at all tires leave different types of marks based on their wear patterns. for example, tires that are constantly flat will leave different impressions than tires that are normally inflated or overinflated. the tires tend to wear out on the parts that are most exposed to the road. you checked out the tires of the two vehicles at the scene. here’s what you found: two tires side by side. a camaro tire which appears to be in good shape, and a toyota tire which appears worn on the outside edges the camaro had normal tires, but the toyota’s tires were a little flat and overly worn on the outside edges. the condition of the red ford truck’s tires is unknown. match the three impressions with the cars that most likely created them. what can you hypothesize about the red pickup’s tires? could this have anything to do with the accident? explain your answer. (two to four sentences) a red pickup fitting fred’s description was later seen running a stoplight. police pulled it over for a check. its tire impressions looked like this: a single tire tread mark which appears worn on the outside edges based on the evidence, do you think this was the same red pickup that rammed the camaro? why or why not? (one to two sentences)