A shopper brought suit in federal district court against a large retail store for negligence, as a result of the shopper having slipped and fallen in the store. The shopper alleged that the fall was caused by a wet floor. During discovery, the shopper requested production of a store surveillance video that showed her slip and fall. The retail store objected on the ground that the video constituted work product. The video was recorded in the ordinary course of business. The video was preserved, rather than recorded over, in anticipation that the slip and fall might eventuate in litigation. The shopper has moved to compel production of the videotape. Should the court grant the shopper's motion to compel?

The answer is "True".

Explanation:

Please find the complete question in the attached file.

In this question, the statement is true because the videotape is not a work item.

The Procedures of Civil Procedure are indeed the lawsuit rules utilized in civil matters in England and Wales by the Court of Appeal, UK High court, and county courts. The CPR aimed at improving access to the courts by facilitating cost-effectiveness, speed, and easier for the quasi to understand.

A pre-trial hearing shall take place at the start of the hearings of the Court of Magistrates. These are designed to handle particular legal problems that need to be addressed before the trial begins.

quid pro quo sexual harassment typically involves an employee being pressured by a superior to provide sexual favors in order to avoid being fired or demoted, or in order to get a promotion, raise or perk.

larceny

theft

explanation: