subject
Law, 28.06.2021 22:10 dylancasebere

Please help, I will give brainliest. I need more than one answer. I am going to begin law school soon but I decided to write an opening statement to see if I am good or not. Sorry if it’s a bit all over the place but i tried. I just want to know your opinion.

Here it is

Diabetic Coma in Car Court Session
Law(s) broken : Driving Without License
Hello, the case I’m presenting to the court is for John and Jane Doe. This case is because Jane Doe drove her husband home because he was having a diabetic seizure in the car and his wife stopped the car and was in the process of driving him to the car when a police officer stopped them. I would like to start off with addressing that it is legal to break the law of murder. One of the biggest law as it includes taking a human’s life. It is legal to break that law if, and only if by breaking the law you save a human life or defend yourself. In this case the witness broke a law because their husband was having a diabetic coma. At most time during this case if there is only a single person in the car and that very person has a diabetic coma, it could cause destruction of property, a chain reaction car crash, and even the person’s life could be lost. Since there were 2 people in the car Ms. Jane stopped the car and was in the process of driving him to the hospital when a police officer stopped them. In the video she took you can see her and in the corner the navigation is set to the nearest hospital. I have asked for the body cam footage to present as deeper evidence and they agreed. Even in the body cam footage you can see that as well. There have been many cases in which the following case has been presented to the court in various different situations and have been exempted and excused of all charges. The law is to protect the people of America and have order, but in this case the law could cause a human life to be lost instead. Your honor, I believe that we can agree that the laws were set to protect the lives of Americans and to have order. What kind of order is there when you have about 5 families who have a loved one or even worse their entire family who has died, simply because of one person. The laws are meant to being justice to Americans, but what kind of justice is there in multiple people dying because of one man who didn’t even know what was happening. Thanks to Ms. Jane that didn’t happen, thanks to Ms. Jane, the possibility of that day being known as the day that many people lost their lives and all because one man who’s wife simply turned a blind eye to even though he was having a diabetic coma. But instead she followed the law even though she knew it would mean having many human lives lost. Possibly even hers. So I stand here in front of the court not asking you to rule for me, but instead to put yourself in the situation. What will you do, break the law to save other people. Or stand with the law even though it means you will probably end up killing others. Your honor, I don’t think there is much more to say. So with that, I rest my case. Hoping that this is enough to suit the court.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 15.07.2019 14:10, lorelaistudent
In which of the following situations must you cross at least two different streams of opposing traffic? a. changing lanes b. turning left c. turning right
Answers: 2
image
Law, 16.07.2019 03:20, angelreji386
When turning left or right, remember to
Answers: 2
image
Law, 16.07.2019 16:10, chelsea73
Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c. congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d. congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.
Answers: 1
image
Law, 16.07.2019 21:40, AgentPangolin
Statute of limitations on debt collection by state
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Please help, I will give brainliest. I need more than one answer. I am going to begin law school so...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 01.05.2021 03:00