subject
Law, 17.06.2021 16:20 aliyahlknox881

A homeowner was injured when an automatic cutoff switch failed to function on a snowblower he was using. The cutoff switch had functioned well for a year after he purchased the snowblower but failed after the machine had been improperly repaired by a mechanic. The snowblower’s operating manual contained a clear and prominent warning against making the same alteration to the switch mechanism made by the mechanic. The mechanic, however, did not have a manual available when he repaired the snowblower. Does the homeowner have a viable claim against the manufacturer of the snowblower for damages? a. No, because the homeowner was comparatively negligent in failing to furnish the snowblower’s manual to the mechanic. b. No, because the injury resulted from a substantial alteration of the snowblower by a third party. c. Yes, because a defect in the snowblower caused the homeowner’s injury. d. Yes, because the manufacturer should have made the manual available to repair personnel.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 15.07.2019 11:10, carlo123
Why is dr. carla o'donnell visiting the jurisville police dept
Answers: 3
image
Law, 15.07.2019 23:10, isiahb123
You are a member of the parole board and you hear joe donovan's case. do you grant parole or not? support your answer with at least three supporting facts from the video.
Answers: 3
image
Law, 15.07.2019 23:10, drakesmith43
What was a super predator and how did that effect juvenile sentences?
Answers: 2
image
Law, 16.07.2019 06:10, ej02duncan1
How must you react to a flashing yellow traffic light?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A homeowner was injured when an automatic cutoff switch failed to function on a snowblower he was us...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 27.02.2021 06:20
Konu
Mathematics, 27.02.2021 06:20