Which statement about the Miranda vs. Arizona case is false?
a) Miranda warnings are required whenever a person is arrested.
b) Miranda warnings are required when custodial interrogation takes place.
c) The Miranda vs. Arizona case is based in the 5th amendment of the U. S. Constitution.
d) The Miranda vs. Arizona case is still a valid legal precedent.
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: Law
Law, 11.07.2019 05:30, alexandradumit3086
"magic" mushrooms have effects similar to those of a. lsd b. pcp c. ketamine d. none of the above
Answers: 1
Law, 13.07.2019 16:10, aliveajones2005
Frequently, two expressways that intersect will be connected by a . a. cloverleaf interchange b. diamond interchange c. trumpet interchange
Answers: 1
Law, 15.07.2019 23:20, drepeter86
What are the ramifications of different interpretations of the relationship between loac and human right laws?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which statement about the Miranda vs. Arizona case is false?
a) Miranda warnings are required when...
Questions in other subjects:
