subject
Law, 25.02.2021 08:10 darcyshay62871

Holding The Court held the 2 Live Crew's version of the song was a ridiculing commentary on
Orbison's work and deserving of protection against the infringement charges. As long as
the work was intended as a parody and not for advertising for the group or its products, the
fact that it was a commercial success for 2 Live Crew does not bar the Crew from using the
Section 107 defense. Question: Assess the court's holding from a consequences based and ethical standpoint

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10, paatnguyyen
Why is the supremacy clause considered to be the root of federalism?
Answers: 1
image
Law, 10.07.2019 04:40, deflox74
Idid a trial but its not letting me view the questions without signing me out.
Answers: 1
image
Law, 11.07.2019 05:30, alexandradumit3086
"magic" mushrooms have effects similar to those of a. lsd b. pcp c. ketamine d. none of the above
Answers: 1
image
Law, 16.07.2019 15:10, gaby06
Sleep hygiene is a. brushing your teeth before bed b. making sure your sheets are clean c. practicing good habits to make sure you're rested and alert d. seeing a sleep doctor to understand clean sleeping
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Holding The Court held the 2 Live Crew's version of the song was a ridiculing commentary on
O...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 22.06.2019 22:00