Ms. Urbanski kept a pistol in her home as protection against intruders. One evening, she heard a noise in the den and went to investigate. Upon entering the room, she saw a man stealing her television. The burglar, seeing the gun, ran for the window, but Ms. Urbanski fired and killed him before he could escape. In a trial for manslaughter, Ms. Urbanski pleaded self-defense. Would you find her guilty? Why or why not?

i would find her not guilty but in most cases they would most find her not guilty and put her on a less charge. but i would say shes not gulity because the guy was breaking an entry Ms.urbanski was proberly was scared what might happen to her. and plus if she is an older women she proberly cant fight for her self even if she did an average man can most likely take down and average woman. i would also say that Ms.Urbanski didnt know if he had a gun or not so her life could of been in danger and lastly if Ms.Urbanski had a clear criminal record which would make this her first incident this could save her from being convicted

Explanation:

larceny

theft

explanation:

answer:

it is not true that when a bullet is fired, gunpowder only travels back towards the shooter. though gunpowder residue can remain on the shooter's hand for a few hours.

explanation: