HELP I NEED THIS ANSWER ASAP What argument best responds to citizens who do not vote because they feel that no political candidates speak for them?

A. Voting is the only way one qualifies to run for office, which is necessary to replace incumbent candidates.

B. Voting will help candidates reflect citizens' interests.

C. Voting often makes no difference, so citizens should run for public office themselves.

D. Political parties will learn from the low voter turnout how to better please voters

D

Explanation:

I would say D because not most votes rely on citizens. Even though they so like to have citizens vote so they can now who the state would rather have to run. But D is best answer because the political parties want voters to vote so they want to do all they can to please the citizens and have them vote. :) I hope this helps

arsonist charge

explanation:

when you light somebody's property on fire you are considered and arsonist and are charged with an arsonist charge

keep quite, set up,sorry