Scenario: You are a defense attorney and one of the students in the video above has wrongfully identified your client as the thief of the laptop. Given what you know about: effortful vs. automatic encoding state-dependent and mood-congruent memory interference, and the constructive nature of memory (including misinformation, imagination, and source amnesia effects), how would you challenge the validity and reliability of that eyewitness testimony? What arguments would you use to confront the witness in your cross-examination and attack his/her credibility? Write a defense of at least 300 words, answering the questions in red above. Use the research articles below, as well as the material from the rest of this lesson, to support your conclusions. Make sure to use the Key Terms correctly and format them in bold