A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner who had hired the contractor to build an apartment over an existing garage. The action turned on the scope of the work covered by the contract. The contractor and the homeowner were the only witnesses at the bench trial, and they strongly disagreed about the scope of the work. At the end of the trial, the judge stated findings of fact on the record but never issued a written opinion. Neither party objected to the findings. The judge found in favor of the homeowner, and the contractor appealed. Is the appellate court likely to overturn the findings?
Answers: 1
Law, 15.07.2019 14:10, lorelaistudent
In which of the following situations must you cross at least two different streams of opposing traffic? a. changing lanes b. turning left c. turning right
Answers: 2
Law, 15.07.2019 22:40, Cheyenne8694
How has the sentence for felony murder for minors changed over time?
Answers: 1
Law, 16.07.2019 18:20, levilugar
Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb
Answers: 1
A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner wh...
Biology, 13.07.2019 00:10
Computers and Technology, 13.07.2019 00:10
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 00:10
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 00:10
English, 13.07.2019 00:10