In the past, the rules of discovery were very restrictive, and trials often turned on elements of surprise. For example, a plaintiff would not necessarily know until the trial what the defendant’s defense was going to be. In the last several decades, however, new rules of discovery have substantially changed this situation. Now each attorney can access practically all the evidence that the other side intends to present at trial, with the exception of certain information–namely, the opposing attorney’s work product. Work product is not a precise concept. Basically, it includes all of the attorney’s thoughts on the case. Can you see any reason why such information should not be made available to the opposing attorney? Discuss fully.

answer:

a bird as actual bird

answer:

monkey

primate

descriptionmonkey is a common name that may refer to groups or species of mammals, in part, the simians of infraorder simiiformes. the term is applied descriptively to groups of primates, such as families of new world monkeys and old world monkeys. wikipedia

phylum: chordata

kingdom: animalia

lifespan: mandrill: 20 years, japanese macaque: 27 years, more

mass: rhesus macaque: 17 lbs, mandrill: 42 – 82 lbs, more encyclopedia of life

height: mandrill: 1.8 – 2.1 ft., japanese macaque: 1.9 ft., common marmoset: 7.4 in., golden lion tamarin: 10 in., olive baboon: 2.3 ft.

length: rhesus macaque: 1.7 ft., mandrill: 2.5 – 3.1 ft.,

answer:

do you think it is fair that you get in trouble because you have you're instagram put and get in trouble. it is your social media not theirs. i am the one who has to be careful. they don't have to take care of me.

people who make a question that includes something that isn't a question should be banned