subject
Law, 07.06.2020 22:57 ejohnstonee111

The United States Supreme Court rules that, despite the principles of federalism, the welfare of children in Idaho is more important than their parents' rights to engage in certain religious practices. Therefore, the Idaho law providing a religious-belief exemption for parents from the duty to provide medical care for their children is struck down as unconstitutional. Reluctantly, Idaho's legislature passes a new law that is consistent with federal law in this area. Let's review a few more concepts before you make another decision about this scenario.

When state criminal law and federal criminal law are incompatible, federal law enforcement agents are .

A. required to abide by state criminal laws because of federalism
b. authorized, though not required, to disregard state criminal laws while enforcing the contradictory federal criminal statutes
C. limited in their ability to enforce the contradictory federal criminal statutes, if so indicated in the text of state criminal law
D. powerless to enforce either state or federal criminal law because of federalism

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 09.07.2019 07:10, omar1590
Do we actually do work like math, reading, etc? ?
Answers: 2
image
Law, 12.07.2019 04:20, hayleebeals50
My town doesn't allow solar panels, but i know they are a great source of renewable energy and can save you money. how can i make my town allow solar panels?
Answers: 2
image
Law, 15.07.2019 23:30, therealpr1metime45
E 1. what are the ramifications of between loac and human rights law?
Answers: 2
image
Law, 16.07.2019 16:10, makaylajones74pdxtrk
Justices practice judicial restraint when they
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
The United States Supreme Court rules that, despite the principles of federalism, the welfare of chi...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 15.10.2019 05:30
Konu
Physics, 15.10.2019 05:30