Explain how it is easier to win monetary damages ($) than a criminal conviction?

It is easier to win monetary damages than a criminal conviction because the consequences of a crime is much severe than a monetary damage, the punishment differ when it comes between criminal and civil cases.

Explanation:

There is a massive difference between a crime and civil, a criminal case is a cause that affects the state, authorities as well as the public, like murdering a person, whereas a monetary damage affects the individual that was affected but not the state.

It is easier to win monetary damages than a criminal conviction because the consequences of a crime is much severe than a monetary damage, the punishment differ when it comes between criminal and civil cases.

A criminal conviction is persecuted by the state and even given imprisonment for years, whereas the punishment given for a monetary damage as much less consequences than criminal conviction.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

answer:   idk sorry

explanation: