subject
Law, 07.03.2020 04:42 cody1097

A suspect is involved in an automobile accident and is properly arrested for drunk driving. The police take the suspect to a hospital and a doctor draws a blood sample without the suspect’s consent or a warrant. Blood alcohol content evidence is admitted against the defendant at trial. What did the U. S. Supreme Court decide in Schmerber v. California (1966), about the admissibility of this procedure?

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10, ecenteno2004
What does charged off as bad debt canceled by credit grantor mean?
Answers: 2
image
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30, hallee25
Which statement best explains why article iii of the constitution gives congress the ability to create lower courts inferior to the supreme court "from time to time”? a. the framers of the constitution believed that as the country grew, more courts would be needed to meet its needs. b. the framers of the constitution believed that as courts made unpopular decisions, they would need to be replaced. c. the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that congress always had more power than the courts. d. the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that new courts were always being created so new judges could be appointed.
Answers: 3
image
Law, 21.07.2019 15:10, gabrielolivas59
What type of government do we have in the us
Answers: 1
image
Law, 21.07.2019 23:10, mollybeale
In 2007 the two most costly components of under age drinking in florida were a. violent crime and drug toxicity deaths b. violent crimes and traffic collisions c. drug toxicity deaths and rehabilitation
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A suspect is involved in an automobile accident and is properly arrested for drunk driving. The poli...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 16.01.2020 05:31
Konu
History, 16.01.2020 05:31