The supreme court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and began to search for the man because "the fourth amendment does not require police officers to delay in the course of an investigation if to do so would gravely endanger their lives or the lives of others" in: a. payton v. new york b. warden v. hayden c. united states v. watson d. tennessee v. garner

Correct answer will be (B) - Warden V. Hayden

so you come to the correct conclusions and make the right decision based on good judgment and a clear mind and valid thought processes behind it, and not just hasty thinking and recklessness.

explanation:

hey love i hoped this if it didn't let me know. you so much and have a wonderful day : ) keep doing the very best you can and never give up you can do it

answer:

so they didn't get shot,exploded, arrested, or killed for that matter. why else? its a military base why should you want to step foot on a land-mined field? and why would you want to get shot or exploded? people may seem dumb but in reality there not, they actually thought this on trough.

explanation: