Consider again the harris v. forklift case at the end of chapter 1 "introduction to law and legal systems". the supreme court ruled that ms. harris was entitled to be heard again by the federal district court, which means that there would be a trial on her claim that mr. hardy, owner of forklift systems, had created a "hostile working environment" for ms. harris. apart from the legal aspects, did he really do anything unethical? how can you tell?